The second premise: If we humans are totally subject to the same law, then we cannot be held morally responsible for our actions because they are a mere effect of a chain of events and not a matter of our free choice. One phenomenon or object exerts influence on the other. All events are tied to each other by cause and effect. Kantian argument from morality. The first premise of Immanuel Kant (†1804): The universe is subject to the law of causation. It is useful both for proving God’s existence and for improving your logical thinking skills.Ĥ. Given that the non-existence of the Absolute Being is logically impossible, then it necessarily exists, and therefore there is a God. Non-existence is an imperfection, after all. If we have this concept of a perfect Being in our brains, this Being can’t be non-existent because otherwise it wouldn’t be perfect. Here is how it goes: God is the all-perfect Being, the Ideal One. Not everyone accepts this argument but it has become an integral part of the history of philosophy and religion. It sounds weird and unusual but it has withstood scrutiny and criticism by many notable philosophers. Ontological argument. It was first introduced by Anselm of Canterbury (†1109) however, some authors claim that Plotinus (†270) was the first to come up with that argument. Hence, science is based on the assumption of intelligent design of our world.ģ. Berg, The Theory of Evolution. Petrograd, 1922, pp. Unless we make this assumption, true scientific exploration is impossible.” (L.S. L.S.Berg, a prominent Soviet scientist (†1950), put it aptly, “The basic premise, which a researcher uses to understand the laws of nature, is that nature has laws, that it is fathomable and knowable that there is a pre-established harmony between the laws of thinking and the laws of nature. The smart design of the world leads us to think of a sentient and powerful Being who created this world or set it in motion. One of the most ancient yet a very simple and convincing argument, which essentially boils down to the observed intelligent design of the world both in general and in its parts. This is the perfect and absolute Being who gave birth to the world, and we call him God.Ģ. The first cause has to have the cause of its own existence in itself. Nevertheless, this chain of causation is finite, i.e., there must be the first cause, which is the source of all things. Everything or almost everything in the world has a cause, an origin. Its basic premise is the concept of causality. The history of this argument goes back to Aristotle (†322 BC), Plato (†347 BC), and other philosophers. It is one of the most ancient arguments in favor of the existence of God. Cosmological argument (Greek Kosmos, lit. Here are five rational arguments to help every Christian to discuss the existence of God with atheists or agnostics.ġ. We are so accustomed to the idea that God exists that we stop thinking about our faith hence, we cannot maintain a healthy dialog about it. Sadly, Christians cannot provide such arguments sometimes. Nevertheless, our opponents demand rational arguments in favor of our point of view. Believers, on the other hand, can ask non-believers the same question: how can one not believe in God given that it is impossible to prove God’s non-existence rationally and logically. The same question was asked in previous centuries, too. Many people wonder how one can believe in God in the 21st century.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |